![\"\"](\"http:\/\/box5670.temp.domains\/~lindent1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/mainimg.about_recent_grants.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/a>Environmental Markets<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Reductions in Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (“REDD”)<\/strong>.<\/em>\u00a0 Deforestation is the single largest cause of biodiversity loss worldwide and also accounts for approximately 10% of global greenhouse-gas emissions. \u00a0 LTC supported the effort to amend the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to allow carbon credits to be granted to countries that demonstrate reductions in their emissions of carbon dioxide due to deforestation. \u00a0 Because the treaty currently provides no incentive for countries to reduce deforestation, we believe that this change could have a very significant impact, both in biodiversity conservation and in mitigating climate change, by providing, for the first time, a significant economic value to standing trees. \u00a0In the absence of an amendment to the treaty, we also supported efforts to secure multi-billion-dollar, multi-year funding to launch REDD activities in multiple tropical countries. \u00a0We have also supported\u00a0several workshops\u00a0to advance the application of REDD in protected areas. \u00a0 We secured co-investments to the organizations we support from five individual donors: Edward Bass, David Blood, Jesse Fink, Joseph Gleberman, and Roger and Victoria Sant. \u00a0 In addition, some of our support has been in partnership with the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and ClimateWorks Foundation. \u00a0Project period: 2006-2016.<\/p>\n A Market-Based Approach to Nutrient Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay.<\/strong>\u00a0 An increasing number of rivers, lakes and coastal waters worldwide suffer from a dramatic loss of biodiversity caused by pollution from fertilizer, sewage, and other “nutrients.” A cap-and-trade approach to this problem has long been considered, and has been tried at a small scale in certain affected locations. \u00a0 This initiative sought to implement this approach at large scale for the first time in one high-profile location: the Chesapeake Bay, the world’s third-largest estuary, which has been severely affected by nutrient pollution. \u00a0 In 2010 the Federal government imposed a bay-wide cap on nutrient pollution. \u00a0 The success of this cap will critically depend, in part, on (1) the ability of municipal polluters to reduce pollution cost-effectively and (2) increased actions by unregulated polluters, including farms, to reduce their own pollution. \u00a0 We sought to facilitate this by establishing state and Federal policies to enable trading, and by working with select municipalities to ensure that some initial trades are completed, to serve as models for others. \u00a0 We secured co-investments from three individual donors: David Blood, Joseph Gleberman, and Roger and Victoria Sant. \u00a0 Project period: 2007-2015.<\/p>\n Reducing Carbon Emissions from Coastal Ecosystems (“Blue Carbon”).<\/strong>\u00a0 Coastal ecosystems such as mangroves, salt marshes, and seagrass meadows are highly biodiverse, vitally important to broader marine life, and provide critical services such as pollution filtration and storm protection. \u00a0 Yet, due to coastal development, agriculture, aquaculture, pollution and other forces, they are being lost around the world at up to 2% per year – about four times as fast as tropical forests. \u00a0 In the search for tools to halt or reverse this trend, regulation has had some effect in developed countries, but in most of the world, the trajectory of rapid loss continues. \u00a0 In this context, Blue Carbon stands out as having significant potential. \u00a0 These ecosystems sequester carbon at a high rate – likely more per square meter than any other major ecosystem – and the sediment under them contains centuries or millennia of accreted carbon. \u00a0 So their destruction not only halts the sequestration flux but also causes substantial emissions of previously-sequestered carbon from the sediment. \u00a0 This in turn may make it possible to create a linkage between the protection or restoration of these ecosystems and financial flows from carbon markets. \u00a0We have supported (1) efforts to estimate the magnitude of blue-carbon emissions; (2) preliminary economic analyses to determine whether and where the potential revenue from Blue Carbon offset credits may outweigh the costs of protecting or restoring these ecosystems; and (3) efforts to incorporate mechanisms under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to compensate the protection and restoration of these ecosystems. \u00a0 In addition to the policy advocacy itself, this work has produced\u00a0several reports<\/a>\u00a0on Blue Carbon science, economics and policy. \u00a0We joined in funding this work by individual donors including Gregory Alexander, Joseph Gleberman and Roger and Victoria Sant. \u00a0Project period: 2010-2016.<\/p>\n Climate-Change Mitigation Beyond the “Cap”.<\/strong> \u00a0<\/em>In both the global and U.S. policy arenas, cap-and-trade systems have emerged among the leading policy tools for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions. \u00a0However, because these systems largely impose caps only on emissions from fossil fuel burning and other industrial activities, they generally regulate sectors accounting for only 80% or less of total emissions. \u00a0Further, such caps are generally set at levels that merely reduce, rather than eliminate, emissions from the capped sectors. \u00a0Yet science indicates that, to avoid dangerous climate change, total emissions must be cut by as much as 80%. \u00a0Consequently, the caps by themselves will be insufficient, and it will be necessary to also reduce emissions from uncapped sectors such as forestry, agriculture, landfills and others. \u00a0The goal of this initiative, which ran from 2008 to 2010, was to ensure that any U.S. climate regulation incorporated well-designed mechanisms to reduce uncapped emissions. \u00a0This could have included a combination of offset mechanisms, under which emission reductions by uncapped entities could be bought by capped entities to meet their obligations, and other mechanisms.<\/p>\n <\/a>Conservation Finance<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Expanding and Financing the Park System in Chilean Patagonia.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong>Tompkins Conservation (TC), a non-profit dedicated to conserving biodiversity, has handed back over 400,000 hectares (one million acres) of land it conserved to the Chilean government, making it the largest conservation donation ever from a private entity to a country.\u00a0 With this effort and over 3.6 million hectares (9 million acres) of federal land from Chile, the addition expands national parklands in Chile by 38.5 percent \u2013 which includes the Tompkins\u2019 properties, Pumal\u00edn and Patagonia Parks, the expansion of two existing parks, Hornopir\u00e9n and Corcovado, and one national reserve, Alacalufes.\u00a0 Chilean President Michelle Bachelet officially declared the national park system expansion, which is roughly the size of Switzerland and will protect large areas of Chile\u2019s rainforests, grasslands, and other terrain.\u00a0 These protected areas will also promote long-term conservation of biodiversity of species native to South America and will bring economic opportunities to the nearby communities.\u00a0 Linden Trust for Conservation made grants to TC, or its predecessors, for land conservation and park infrastructure, and is a strategic advisor on financing for the new parks. \u00a0Linden Trust for Conservation has been involved with and supported TC since 2006.<\/p>\n ARPA for Life.\u00a0<\/strong>The Amazon basin is a landscape of global importance. \u00a0 It covers more than 670 million hectares (1.6 billion acres), an area about two-thirds the size of the U.S., and spans nine countries; Brazil accounts for 60%. \u00a0It is home to half of the world’s remaining tropical forests, one-fifth of Earth’s available fresh water, and approximately one in ten known species on Earth. \u00a0Furthermore, more than 30 million people, including 350 indigenous and ethnic groups, live in and depend on the Amazon. \u00a0 Unfortunately, about 20% of the Amazon forest has already been lost, and the destruction continues, due to unsustainable expansion of agriculture and cattle ranching, construction of roads and dams, and extractive activities. \u00a0 In 1998, Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso pledged to protect 10% of the Brazilian Amazon. \u00a0The lasting result of that declaration is the Amazon Region Protected Areas (ARPA) program, whose goal is to secure long-term protection for an ecologically representative sample of the biodiversity of the Brazilian Amazon in well-managed protected areas. \u00a0 ARPA now seeks to protect 15% of the Brazilian Amazon, or 60 million hectares (150 million acres) \u2013 an area equivalent to three times the size of the entire U.S. national-parks system. \u00a0ARPA has made major strides toward that goal: to date, it has protected 32.5 million hectares (80 million acres). \u00a0And this includes massive creation of new protected areas: new creation in ARPA’s Phase 1 alone (2003-2009) accounts for approximately 27% of all protected areas created globally in the same period. \u00a0Yet ARPA is incomplete. \u00a0The remaining challenge is to complete the network and, crucially, to secure all the financial and institutional resources needed to protect it. \u00a0The “ARPA for Life” project, which closed in May 2014, mobilized, in a single deal, all the financial and other commitments needed to permanently protect ARPA’s 60 million hectares. \u00a0The deal included commitments by donors to place $215 million into a new trust fund, the ARPA Transition Fund, and commitments by the Brazilian government to expand and strengthen the protected areas and to gradually increase its own funding of the network. \u00a0The Transition Fund supplements the government’s funding, in diminishing amounts over 25 years, as and if the government increases its funding and continues to expand and protect the areas. \u00a0The purpose of this deal is to assist and motivate the Brazilian government to strengthen and take full financial ownership of ARPA. \u00a0The 60 million hectare size of ARPA makes “ARPA for Life” the single largest land conservation deal in history.\u00a0 Project period: 2011-2014. \u00a0See\u00a0press coverage.<\/a><\/p>\n Forever Costa Rica.<\/strong>\u00a0 Many countries’ natural heritages suffer not only because insufficient areas have been designated as protected from development, but also because there are insufficient funds to manage those areas that are protected. \u00a0 Costa Rica has been a world leader in assigning national-park or other protected status to approximately 25% of its territory. \u00a0 This land, totaling 1.3 million hectares (3.2 million acres), is believed to harbor as much as 4% of the world’s biodiversity \u2014 roughly equivalent to all the species in the United States and Canada combined. \u00a0 However, this system has lacked funding structures to ensure that it will be well-managed in perpetuity. \u00a0 In addition, the country’s current marine protected areas have been inadequate to sustain its collapsing fisheries and protect its extraordinary diversity of marine life. \u00a0 With the Forever Costa Rica project, whose implementation began in 2010, Costa Rica now intends to at least double its marine protected areas and dramatically improve management of both its marine and terrestrial protected-area systems. \u00a0Critically, it is doing this on the basis of sustainable financing secured by the project. \u00a0 This includes increased government expenditures and $57 million in new funding from external private, bilateral and multilateral donors, managed by a newly created, independent, special-purpose trust fund. \u00a0 When the project is fully implemented, it will make Costa Rica the first developing nation to achieve all of the protected-area goals of the United Nations’ Convention on Biological Diversity and will thereby position it to serve as a model for others. \u00a0LTC conceived and launched this project in 2007 in conjunction with then-President Arias of Costa Rica, recruited our partners, and led the management of the project through its closing in 2010. \u00a0 Implementation is being led by a newly-created trust, the\u00a0Forever Costa Rica Association<\/a>, in partnership with the government of Costa Rica. \u00a0Project period: 2007-2014. \u00a0For more information on Forever Costa Rica, see the\u00a0Executive Summary<\/a> or the full Project Report<\/a>.<\/p>\n Restoration of the Great Plains.\u00a0<\/strong> The objective of this initiative is to partially restore significant features of the American Great Plains, including the ecological restoration of the bison. \u00a0In order to accomplish this we are supporting two major projects.\u00a0 The Northern Great Plains program of the\u00a0World Wildlife Fund<\/a>\u00a0seeks to restore and conserve one of the most important grassland ecosystems on Earth. \u00a0Its flagship project is creating the American Prairie Reserve in eastern Montana, by purchasing title to, or leasing grazing rights on, land totaling approximately 1.3 million hectares (3.2 million acres). \u00a0When complete this will be the largest area for free-roaming bison in North America, and will restore the entire suite of mammals, birds, and plants to its natural state. \u00a0The\u00a0American Prairie Foundation<\/a>\u00a0is the WWF partner and land trust that is leading this effort. \u00a0Additionally, we are supporting the program at the\u00a0Wildlife Conservation Society<\/a>\u00a0for the ecological restoration of the North American bison. \u00a0Project period: 2006-current.<\/p>\n The Great Bear Rainforest\u00a0<\/strong>is the world’s largest intact landscape of pristine coastal temperate rainforest. \u00a0It extends along the Pacific coast of British Columbia to the border with Alaska, and is home to lush vegetation and rare animals, including thousand-year-old giant cedars, the spirit bear, eagles and wild salmon. \u00a0The GBRF is the result of collaboration between the Province of British Columbia, the Canadian government, the private sector, First Nations and a partnership of non-profit organizations. \u00a0This collective effort established over 2 million hectares (4.9 million acres) of protected forests and used innovative financial planning to devote C$120 million to environmental and economic development projects. \u00a0The projects are being carried out by First Nations and forest companies operating under ecosystem-based management. \u00a0Project period: 2004-2007.<\/p>\n Tierra del Fuego.\u00a0<\/strong> Karukinka is the name for a reserve established in Chilean Tierra del Fuego by the\u00a0Wildlife Conservation Society<\/a>\u00a0in 2004, based on a gift of land and financial support from\u00a0Goldman Sachs<\/a>. \u00a0It is an ecologically distinct mixed ecosystem of pristine austral forests, grasslands and massive bogs, and encompassing mountains, valley bottoms, and flatlands, totaling 0.3 million hectares (0.7 million acres). \u00a0Project period: 2004-2005.<\/p>\n <\/a>Institutions<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The following are the largest recipients of our institutional support:<\/p>\n World Wildlife Fund.\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0WWF<\/a>\u00a0is the largest and is one of the leading conservation organizations in the world. \u00a0It focuses particularly on large-scale, ecologically unique landscapes.<\/p>\n